By now, you’ve way of rating the ‘ethics’ of social media companies. EthicsGrade is an ESG rating . Headed up by Charles Radclyffe, the former head of AI at Fidelity, it uses AI-driven models to create a complete picture of the ESG of organizations, harnessing Processing to automate the analysis of enormous data sets. This includes tracking controversial topics and public statements.of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) ratings for companies or ratings for their carbon footprint. Well, now, a UK company has come up with a
EthicsGrade Industry Summary Scorecard – Social Media. Frustrated with the green-washing of some ‘environmental’ stocks, Radclyffe realized that the AI governance ofwas not being adequately considered, despite presenting an enormous risk to investors in the wake of such scandals as the manipulation of Facebook by companies such as Cambridge Analytica during the US Election and the UK’s Brexit referendum. The idea is that companies use these ratings to see better where they should improve. But the twist is that can also see where the risks of AI might lie.
Speaking to TechCrunch, he said: “While at Fidelity, I got a reputation within the firm for being the go-to person for my colleagues in the investment team, who wanted to understand the risks within the technology firms that we were investing in. After being asked several times about some dodgy facial recognition company or a, I realized there was a massive absence of data around this stuff ainstead of anecdotal evidence.”
He says that when he left Fidelity, he decided EthicsGrade would cover not just ESGs but also AI ethics for algorithms-driven platforms. He told me: “We’ve built a model to analyze technology governance. We’ve covered 20 industries. So most of what we’ve published sas been from non-tech companies because these are inherent risks in many industries other than social media or next few weeks, we’re going live with our data on things directly related to tech, starting with social media.”. But over the
Essentially, what they are doing significantly parallels what is done in the ESG space. “The question we want to be able to answer is how does Tik Tok compare againstWhatsApp? And we’ve essentially found ihat things like GDPR have done a lot of good in raising the bar on data privacy and . But in amanyother areas that we cover, such as ethical risk or a firm’s approach to , are indeed technical questions about risk management,” says Radclyffe. But, of course, they are effective rating algorithms. Are the ratings they are giving the social platforms themselves derived from algorithms? EthicsGrade they are training their own AI through NLP to automate what is currently very human analysts centric, just as ‘Sustainalytics et al. did years ago in the environmental arena.
So how are they coming up with these ratings? EthicsGrade evaluates “the extent to which organizations implement transparent and democratic values, ensure informed consent and risk management protocols, and establish a positive environment forand improvement.” And this is all achieved, they say, through publicly available data – policy, website, lobbying, etc. In simple terms, they rate the governance of the AI, not necessarily the algorithms themselves,s but what checks and balances are in place to ensure that the outcomes and inputs are ethical and managed.